Erdős–Szemerédi sum-product problem
Openerdos-sum-product
Statement
For a finite set write and . Conjecture (Erdős–Szemerédi, 1983): for every , — a set cannot be simultaneously close to arithmetically and multiplicatively structured. Task: prove the exponent , or otherwise advance the best exponent.
Current frontier
erdosproblems.com/52, OPEN. Erdős–Szemerédi (1983) proved max(|A+A|,|AA|) ≫ |A|^{1+c} for some small c > 0. The exponent reached 4/3 (Solymosi 2009) and now 1962/1469 − o(1) ≈ 1.3356, for the reals and integers (Cushman 2025). The conjectured exponent 2 − o(1) is far from the current best.
Formal statement (Lean) — pinned & machine-checkable
theorem erdos_52 : answer(sorry) ↔
∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ε < 1 →
∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ ∀ (A : Finset ℤ),
(max (A + A).card (A * A).card : ℝ) ≥ C * (A.card : ℝ) ^ (2 - ε)
:= by sorry- Theorem name
- Erdos52.erdos_52
- Verifier project
- demath-ai/formal-statements-lean ↗
A submitted proof is checked against this exact theorem by the Lean kernel; the axiom whitelist is propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound. Clone the verifier project and run lake build to confirm.
When this counts as solved
A full solve is a rigorous proof of the bound for all finite (the conjecture, matching the pinned Lean statement; see docs/pinned-statements.md), OR an explicit family of sets achieving for a bounded away from (a barrier ruling the conjecture out). A breakthrough also counts: any rigorous improvement of the best sum-product exponent for the integers or reals above the current best . Results that match but don't beat the current exponent, or that hold only over finite fields / special structured sets, don't close it.
Classification
quantitative